Confessions of a radical economics prof

…I realized another problem. The students who believed in the radical view were also convinced that large corporations were so powerful that nothing could be done about them. Instead of inspiring my students to radical activism, I had taught them to be cynical and resigned about the prevailing economic dysfunction and injustice. If they couldn’t do anything about it, they figured, why not at least get rich by becoming an investment banker?

Then I learned about the spiritual principle of non-reaction. When you react to someone you are letting them determine your behavior rather than choosing it yourself. My teaching was largely reactive: by centering on a critique of the text I was continually “reacting” to the book rather than achieving my goal of demolishing mainstream economics – in my students’ heads and in the world. My radical critiques of large corporations were also a reaction, and only emphasized corporate power to such a degree that it made my students feel helpless.

I began to evolve a new way of teaching that focuses less on mainstream economic theory and powerful, profit-motivated corporations. Now we being the term identifying problems and the global warming crisis. I point out the problems associated with consumers, workers and firms acting in self-interested and materialistic ways. I present, discuss and give examples of the emerging “solidarity economy,” which is based on socially responsible or “high road” economic values, practices and institutions: ethical consumption, fair trade, socially responsible corporations. This puts materialistic competitive consumerism and traditional profit-motivated corporations on the defensive. From this point of view one wonders why anyone ever believed that a solely profit-motivated corporation, dedicated to serving its owners (the stockholders), would be able to do right by its other stakeholders: consumers, workers, suppliers, government and the environment. Or why anyone would imagine that buying more and more material things would bring true fulfillment.

Friendly bomb?
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Ping.fm
  • Slashdot
  • email

And then:

  1. Disneyworld Company In the early 80s, when the metallurgical industry in the Lorraine region entered its final crisis, the public powers had...
  2. Why We’re Losing the War on Terror Transnational corporations do not necessarily act in the interest of western governments, however close the relationship might normally be. ...
  3. Catch 22 “They’re trying to kill me,” Yossarian told him calmly. “No one’s trying to kill you,” Clevinger cried. “Then why are...
  4. The Diceman Lil and I had met and mated when we were both twenty-five. We formed a deep, irrational, obviously neurotic need...
  5. All Consuming: How Shopping Got Us Into This Mess And How We Can Find Our Way Out When Tony Blair came to power in 1997, there were 129 shoplifters in prison; now there are 1,400. This dark...
  6. The Bridge “you know,” he said, “if i had my way i wouldn’t let anybody who believed in star signs or...

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply